Liability for Environmental Contamination
CERCLA imposes joint and several liability for cleaning up contamination caused by hazardous substances on four categories of responsible parties.4 min read
Liability Under CERCLA
CERCLA imposes joint and several liability for cleaning up contamination caused by hazardous substances on four categories of responsible parties:
- The current owner or operator of a vessel or a facility;
- The owner or operator of a vessel or facility at the time of disposal of any hazardous substance;
- The generators of any hazardous substances located on the site; and
- Any transporter of hazardous substances to a site the transporter selected. 42 U.S.C. sec. 9607(a)(1)- (4).
Although agreements can be made to apportion liability between responsible parties, no agreement will shield any responsible party from CERCLA liability. CERCLA also imposed liability retroactively to contamination predating the act's passage in 1980.
Defenses to Liability Under CERCLA
CERCLA is a strict liability statute. The only defenses allowed are: act of god, act of war, or, in some limited circumstances, an act of a third party. 42 U.S.C. sec. 9607(b). The third party defense includes protection for innocent landowners, provided they had no reason to know of the existence of hazardous substances and made all "appropriate inquiry into the previous owner and uses of the property consistent with good commercial or customary practice." 42 U.S.C. sec. 9601(35).
Recoverable Costs Under CERCLA
Responsible parties under CERCLA are liable for: all cleanup costs incurred by federal, state or tribal governments that are not inconsistent with the NCP; any other necessary response cost incurred by any other person consistent with the NCP; natural resource damages; and the costs of any health assessment or health effects study. To recover response costs under CERCLA, the response activities must be conducted consistent with the NCP. See 42 U.S.C. sec. 9605; 33 U.S.C. sec. 1321(c); 40 C.F.R. pt. 300. Response costs may be recovered from other parties or from the Superfund. See Section 13.2: Response and Cleanup Requirements and Authorities.
RCRA Cleanup Authorities
Under RCRA, EPA can require an owner or operator of any facility that has a release of hazardous wastes to cleanup the release and any solid waste management unit on the facility, even if the unit was used by a prior operator and contains no hazardous wastes. 42 U.S.C. sec. 6924(u). See also Section 12.2: Hazardous Wastes.
The Oil Pollution Act of 1990
The OPA establishes a comprehensive liability scheme similar to CERCLA but applicable to discharges of oil. Any owner or operator (or other responsible party) of a vessel or facility from which oil is discharged, or which poses the substantial threat of a discharge of oil, into or upon navigable waters adjoining shorelines or the exclusive economic zone is liable up to a certain limit for certain specified removal costs and damages. 33 U.S.C. sec. 2702(a). "Removal costs" mean any costs incurred by the federal, tribal, or state government under the CWA's oil spill response provisions, 33 U.S.C. sec. 1321, or under state law; and any removal costs incurred by any person consistent with the NCP. "Damages" include: damages to natural resources, economic losses to real or personal property, loss of subsistence use of natural resources, the net loss of taxes, royalties or fees, loss of profits, and any increased costs of providing public services. 33 U.S.C. sec. 2702(b)(2). Any third party found to be the sole cause of a discharge can be held liable as a responsible party. 33 U.S.C. 2702(d). There are specific statutory limits on liability, depending on the size and nature of the vessel or facility. 33 U.S.C. sec. 2704.
Financial Responsibility Requirements
Financial assurance requirements are part of the liability systems under CERCLA, RCRA, and the OPA. EPA requires owners or operators of production facilities and certain vessels to have evidence of financial responsibility for covering CERCLA liability. 42 U.S.C. sec. 9608(a)(1). Typically, the financial responsibility requirements can be met with an insurance guarantee, surety bond, or qualification as a self-insurer. Owners or operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of RCRA hazardous wastes must also demonstrate financial responsibility for the estimated costs of cleanup at their facility. All owners or operators of vessels over 300 gross tons, offshore facilities, or deepwater ports must establish evidence of financial responsibility equal to the limits of liability to which they could be subjected for a discharge of oil. Financial responsibility may be established by evidence of insurance, surety bond, guarantee, letter of credit, qualification as a self- insurer, or other evidence of financial responsibility. Failure to meet the financial responsibility requirements can result in a $25,000 per day civil penalty. 42 U.S.C. sec. 9609(a)(1)(C).
State Cleanup Laws
Most state cleanup statutes hold responsible parties strictly liable; that is, the states do not require proof of negligence or deliberate misconduct in holding a responsible party liable for cleanup costs. More than half of the states impose both strict liability and joint and several liability. A few impose joint and several liability, but not strict liability. All but a few states can impose civil penalty provisions for failure to comply with their cleanup statutes. Fines and penalties under these statutes generally range from $10,000 to $50,000 per day. Punitive damages, typically double or triple the state's response costs, are available in approximately half of the states. Under state common law, actions based on nuisance, negligence or strict liability could also form the basis for liability. See Section 4.2: General Environmental Rights or Responsibilities.
From Summary of Environmental Law in the United States - CEC,0The Best Lawyers For Less
Hire the top business lawyers and save on legal feesPost your legal job on Legal Marketplace
by Legal Marketplace